Next up in the metrics posts are the metrics for Test Progress & Control, where we will look at metrics for Test Progress, Product Quality and Defect Resolution
I have included some recommendations to targets to achieve, risks you face by not monitoring this as inspiration.
Happy testing!
/Nicolai
Metric: Test Progress
Measured as:
·
S-curve
planned test cases vs. executed test cases
Purpose / Objective:
·
This
metric aims to ensure that the test is running as planned, and serves as a tool
to see trends of delays for risk mitigation and replanning.
Recommended targets:
·
Test
execution must be monitored for each test level.
Measurement Frequency:
·
Weekly
while test runs or in agreement with stakeholders
Risks if not monitored:
·
Unmanaged
test.
·
Inability
to proactively meet delays.
·
Unknown
progress.
Metric: Product
Quality
Measured as:
·
Number
of failed test cases vs. number of run test cases
Purpose / Objective:
·
This
metric gives stakeholders an indication on the product quality, showing the
amount of test failure for the object under test.
Recommended targets:
·
Trends
of high failure should be followed by a test readiness review ensure that test
resources are not wasted testing immature deliveries.
Measurement Frequency:
·
Weekly
while test is running and prior to test readiness reviews
Risks if not monitored:
·
Unknown
product quality.
·
Inability
to mitigate poor quality early.
Metric: Defect Resolution
Measured as:
·
Defects
that are open and closed and the severity of these defects.
·
Measurement
should be as progress over time to see trend and a snapshot to get overview of
severity of defects.
Purpose / Objective:
·
This
metric gives an indication on the amount of rework that is outstanding and
shows trends of test completeness.
Recommended targets:
·
Critical
defects must be closed prior to release of a product as stated in Nordea’s
Corporate test policy.
Measurement Frequency:
·
Weekly
while test is running and as part of test evaluation after each test level.
Risks if not monitored:
·
Poor
or missing defect management.
·
Unknown
size of the work backlog related to defects.
·
Inability
to see defect trends and test completeness.
·
Unknown
defect severity = inability to prioritize defects for closure.
No comments:
Post a Comment