Problem: Test
automation is easily applied wrong, resulting in huge cost and little
productivity gains.
While
reading Brian
Marick’s “Classic testing mistakes” I came to think of some of the test
automation initiatives I have been involved over the years. Some were successes
other were not, and failure was often due to the mistakes Brian outlines in “Theme
Five: Technology Run Rampart”:
-
Attempting to automate all tests.
- Expecting to rerun manual tests.
- Using GUI capture/replay tools to reduce test creation cost.
- Expecting regression tests to find a high proportion of new bugs.
Solution:
Be careful when introducing test automation - Proof of concept can help you in
the right direction.
In my experience,
there are several things that you can do to increase chances of success when
implementing test automation.
Manage expectations
with the sponsor –
He pays the bills and wants to know when the investment pays off. He I likely
to pressure the test automation project for signoff on business cases that
shows significant return of investment, and he is not likely to be a testing
professional. This means that you need to tell him what to expect – Promises of
great wealth is easy, but the truth about the long journey to get there needs
to be told up front.
Have a strategy for what to automate – Brian is right, automation is not for everything, in fact there are many test cases that are never to be automated. The strategy needs to tell what to automate, what not automate, and more importantly, how to determine what is a candidate for automation. Examples of what to automate could be:
- Repetitive tests that run for multiple builds
- Tests that are highly subject to human error
- Tests that require multiple data sets
- Frequently-used functionality that introduces high risk conditions
- Tests that are impossible to perform manually
- Tests that run on several different hardware or software platforms and configurations
- Tests that take a lot of effort and time when doing manual testing
Choose
the right tool and operator – "A fool with a tool is still a fool, and the wrong tool will make you
a fool!" MAKE A PROOF OF CONCEPT!
That goes for both the tool and the operator. Take the most complicated test
case (that candidates test automation), and make the operator script it using the
tool. If either the tool or the operator fails, then you might want to
reconsider if they are right for the job.
Remember
test automation is not a silver bullet – It will make money if applied right,
but it will be a costly adventure if applied wrong. There is a nice article on
this subject here
– If you want to explore the topic further.
Have a nice
weekend & Happy testing!
/Nicolai
No comments:
Post a Comment